Legal Opinion
Woodson v. Rowland
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided August 14, 1991No. 584A88Published
1Opinion of the Court
407 S.E.2d 222 (1991)
329 N.C. 330
Susie Mae WOODSON, Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Alfred Sprouse, Deceased
v.
Neal Morris ROWLAND; Morris Rowland Utility, Inc.; Davidson & Jones, Inc.; and Pinnacle One Associates, a North Carolina Partnership.
No. 584A88.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
August 14, 1991.
Smith, Patterson, Follin, Curtis, James & Harkavy by Norman B. Smith and Bryan E. Lessley; and John T. Manning, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellant.
Poe, Hoof & Reinhardt by J. Bruce Hoof, Durham, and Poyner & Spruill by John L. Shaw, Raleigh, for defendants-appellees Neal Morris Rowland and…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Bazley v. TortorichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.