Legal Opinion

Taylor v. King

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1925No. Appeal, 4PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

This proceeding is one of mandamus to compel the Secretary of the Commonwealth to advertise a proposed constitutional amendment, which would permit the State to borrow $35,000,000 for certain specified purposes, and the defendant has questioned the right to so proceed in the present year. The Pennsylvania Forestry Association, a party interested in the question involved, presented its views by brief submitted. To the answer filed by the attorney general, a demurrer was interposed, and the learned court below reached the conclusion that the order prayed for could…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GriestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Collins v. KephartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Armstrong v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Hollinger v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. STANDER v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Bergdoll v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Graham v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Pa Prison Society v. CortesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API