Legal Opinion
Bergdoll v. Kane
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 15, 1999PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
This is a direct appeal filed on behalf of Yvette Kane, Secretary of the Commonwealth, from the order of the Commonwealth Court which granted summary judgment against her in a quo warranto action challenging the placement of a proposed constitutional amendment on the November 7, 1995 ballot. For the following reasons, we affirm.
On October 17, 1995, John G. Bergdoll, K. Robin Davis and Gerald C. Grimaud (Appellees) filed an Application for Leave to File Complaint in Quo Warranto, a Complaint in Quo Warranto, and a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- South Whitehall Township Police Service v. South Whitehall TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re 42 PA. C. S. § 1703Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Nye v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- In Re HicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- State v. ConleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- American Civil Liberties Union v. DarnellTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- Spahn v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.