Legal Opinion

Pa Prison Society v. Cortes

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 1, 2010No. 09-3017, 09-3018PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge.

We are asked to decide whether an amendment to Article IV, § 9(a) of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, that alters the voting procedures employed by the Pennsylvania Board of Pardons to require unanimity in recommending pardons and commutations for life-sentenced prisoners to the Governor, violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution.

The District Court ruled that the constitutional amendment, passed by Pennsylvania voters in 1997 (“1997 Amendment”), violates the Ex Post Facto Clause for prisoners sentenced…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  2. Jurista v. Amerinox Processing, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
  3. Behrend v. Comcast Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. Dennis v. DeJongDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. United States ex rel. FLFMC, LLC v. TFH Publications, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API