Millhollin v. the Conveyor Company
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
¶1 Billy B. Millhollin (Millhollin) appeals from the judgment entered by the Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Rosebud County, on its order granting the motion for summary judgment filed by The Conveyor Company (TCC) and denying his summary judgment motion. We affirm.
¶2 The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in concluding that TCC did not breach its contract with Millhollin and in granting TCC’s motion for summary judgment on that basis.
BACKGROUND
¶3 Millhollin invented a device for aligning conveyor belts which he called a Conveyor Belt Return Training Device…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Filmtec Corporation v. Allied-Signal Inc., and Uop Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Bell Intercontinental Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Clark v. Eagle Systems, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.