Legal Opinion
Bell Intercontinental Corporation v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 20, 1967No. 92-62PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Herbert N. Maletz with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in a report and opinion filed on November 28, 1966. Plaintiff excepted to the commissioner’s report and opinion only as to a single question of law pertaining to the Agusta 47-J and Nippon 47-D-l agreements and the defendant excepted only as to the Houde agreement. The case was submitted to the court on oral argument of counsel and the briefs of the parties. Since the court agrees with the commissioner’s…
3Cases cited43 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Myers v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1946
- Allen, Collector of Internal Revenue v. WernerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Orla E. Watson and Edith Watson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by64 opinions
- Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Harris v. Emus Records Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Prima Tek II, L.L.C. v. A-Roo Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Tolwinsky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.