Legal Opinion
Filmtec Corporation v. Allied-Signal Inc., and Uop Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 24, 1991No. 90-1228PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
Allied-Signal Inc. and UOP Inc. (Allied), defendants-appellants, appeal from the preliminary injunction issued by the district court in FilmTec Corp. v. Allied-Signal, Inc., C.A. No. 89-0919-GT(M) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 1990). The trial court enjoined Allied from “making, using or selling, and actively inducing others to make use or sell TFCL membrane in the United States, and from otherwise infringing claim 7 of United States Patent No. 4,277,344 [’344].” The injunction issued following the findings and conclusions of the district court reported in FilmTec Corp. v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Mitchell v. WinslowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1843
- Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Auto Body Panels of Ohio, Inc., and Haur Tay Enterprise Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Hendrie v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- SiRF Technology, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Arachnid, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Merit Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- New England Braiding Co., Inc. And Seal Company of New England, Inc. v. A.W. Chesterton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Speedplay, Inc. v. Bebop, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. NAVINTA LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.