Legal Opinion

19 Solid Waste Department Mechanics v. City of Albuquerque

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1996No. 94-2268PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge.

This case involves a challenge by 19 mechanics to the City of Albuquerque’s drug testing policy. The district court ruled that the policy violated both the Fourth Amendment and the New Mexico Open Meetings Act, and the City appealed. Since the time of oral argument, however, the parties properly have agreed that, because the district court has not yet addressed the issue of damages, an appeal of the Fourth Amendment ruling is premature. See Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737, 744, 96 S.Ct. 1202, 1206-07, 47 L.Ed.2d 435 (1976); Horn v. Transcon Lines,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Horn v. Transcon Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Billie Pirner GardeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  5. Jones v. TemmerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Black Police Association v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. Amoco Oil Co. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Lewis v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. SlaterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Powder River Basin Resource Council v. Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality and Brook Mining Company, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API