Legal Opinion
United States v. Billie Pirner Garde
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 17, 1988No. 88-5022PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
2Per curiam
In the course of representing its clients, Government Accountability Project (“GAP”) 1 received information about safety problems at the South Texas Nuclear Plant (“South Texas”). GAP offered to provide this information to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC” or “agency”) on the condition that informant identities and information that could lead to the informants’ identification, be kept confidential. GAP also requested that the information be provided to a special team of the NRC office other than the NRC Region IV, which had a reputation for disclosing confidential…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Karcher v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., and Ringsby-Pacific, Ltd. v. Western Conference of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by34 opinions
- David A. Clarke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- National Black Police Association v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- American Library Association, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Van Schaack Holdings, Ltd. v. FulenwiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Clarendon Ltd. v. Nu-West Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.