Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Southern California Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1906No. Civ. No. 226PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGray, P. J.

This action is brought by plaintiff to recover damages from defendant for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff’s■ husband by one of defendant’s passenger trains at a street crossing in the city of San Bernardino. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, defendant’s motion for a nonsuit was granted. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment which followed.

The only question presented arises upon the order granting the nonsuit. It is contended by appellant that, while the negligence of the deceased must be admitted to have contributed to his death, yet the defendant’s engineer had notice…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Holmes v. South Pacific Coast RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Esrey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Clark v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Scholl v. BelcherOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Bullock v. Western Wholesale Drug Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Wade v. ThorsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API