Legal Opinion

Wade v. Thorsen

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1935No. Civ. 9122PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

In the winter season of 1931-1932 plaintiffs were growing a crop of cauliflower on property of plaintiff W. W. Henley, being a part of the lowlands of Santa Clara Valley in an area between the towns of Alviso and Milpitas, and only a short distance from the southern margin of San Francisco Bay. These lands were from seven to nine feet above sea level. The crop was located on land on both sides of Zanker road and west of the Coyote River. Zanker road runs north from the road known as the Alviso-Milpitas road. Defendant Charles Boots owns a farm lying just north of and adjoining the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Austin v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Neilson v. HouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Hatton v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Vaughan v. County of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Noble v. Kertz & Sons Feed & Fuel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. City of Oakland v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Redd v. Airway Motor Coach Lines, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Brugger v. Lee YimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API