Legal Opinion
Krueger v. Wilde
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1994No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and verdict reinstated. Memorandum: In this wrongful death action, the jury appor*989tioned fault 65% to decedent and 35% to defendants. Supreme Court set aside the jury’s apportionment of fault and granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial unless defendants stipulated to accept Supreme Court’s apportionment of fault 100% to them. That was error. We cannot conclude that "there is simply no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational [persons] to the conclusion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Regan v. Long Island Rail RoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Coffey v. CallichioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Nitzke v. LovelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Teller v. AnzanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Severino v. Schuyler Meadows Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Krueger v. WildeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Saint Ex Rel. Saint v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Braun v. CesareoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019