Legal Opinion

Bariel v. Tuinstra

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1954No. 32933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his action for rescission of a contract by which he purchased from defendant one hundred' head of cattle and certain farm machinery.

In his complaint, plaintiff sought rescission -on grounds that defendant fraudulently represented that the cows were free from Bang’s disease, whereas the herd contained a number of Bang’s “reactors” (animals infected with the disease) and some “suspects” (animals possibly infected).

Defendant’s answer denied that he represented the cows to be free from the disease and alleged that he voluntarily informed plaintiff that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. West Coast Dairy Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Eliason v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Streeter v. VaughanWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Cloakey v. BouslogWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Darst v. MedunaWashington Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Costandi v. Aamco Automatic Transmissions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. DeCoria v. Red's Trailer Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  3. Wickre v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. W. L. Reid Co. v. M-B Contracting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Evans v. DormanNevada Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API