Legal Opinion

Paverud v. Niagara MacHine & Tool Works

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1987No. B009698PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

—Niagara Machine & Tool Works (Niagara) appeals from a judgment after jury trial in favor of respondent Cheryl Paverud (Paverud). Paverud successfully sued Niagara on the theories of negligence, strict liability and breach of warranties for the loss of four fingers resulting from an industrial accident. Niagara alleges several trial court errors involving Niagara’s defense of superseding cause, including the denial of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and refused jury instructions. Because the jury received no instruction on the critical theory of superseding cause, we…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Torres v. Xomox Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Veronese v. Lucasfilm Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Kuhns v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API