Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Slenderella Systems of California, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1954No. L. A. Mo. 22972PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*109EDMONDS, J. J.
Harry M. Schwartz sued Slenderella Systems of California, Inc., to enjoin the assertedly wrongful use of a trade name. His appeal from an adverse judgment presents for decision questions as to the sufficiency of the evidence and the findings to support the judgment.
Some of the facts were presented by stipulation. Counsel also agreed that the trial court should consider as evidence certain depositions, photographs, advertising matter, the stationery used by each of the parties, and an affidavit concerning a trade-mark search made by counsel for the defendant.
These facts are…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- American Automobile Ass'n v. American Automobile Owners Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Winfield v. CharlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- MacSweeney Enterprises, Inc. v. TarantinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Audio Fidelity, Inc., a Corporation v. High Fidelity Recordings, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Hmh Publishing Co., Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Playboy Clubs International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Victor BrincatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- People Ex Rel. Mosk v. National Research Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- National Van Lines, a Corporation v. Alfred E. Dean, Trading Under the Firm Name of National Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Motors, Inc. v. Times Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.