Legal Opinion
Hoover Co. v. Groger
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 12, 1936No. Civ. 10854PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the publication! of the names of certain defendants in that part of the telephone directory of defendant Southern California Telephone Company, commonly known as the classified business directory in such a manner as to mislead the public concerning plaintiff’s business. The appeal is taken by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants. No brief has been filed in this court by any of the defendants.
The plaintiff, under the names, “THE HOOVER COMPANY” and “HOOVER SUCTION SWEEPER COMPANY” is and for many years has been engaged in the business of manufacturing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Dodge Stationery Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Yellow Cab Co. of San Diego v. SachsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. MosesianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Morton v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Sunbeam Furniture Corp. v. Sunbeam Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- MacSweeney Enterprises, Inc. v. TarantinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Wood v. PefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.