Legal Opinion
Ryan v. Real Estate of the Pac., Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided February 26, 2019No. D072724PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHuffman, J.
*131*639Real Estate of the Pacific, Inc., doing business as Pacific Sotheby's International Realty (Sotheby's), David Schroedl, and David Schroedl & Associates (DSA) (Sotheby's, Schroedl, and DSA collectively Defendants) successfully moved for summary judgment against Daniel Ryan and Patricia Ryan, individually and as trustees of the Ryan Family Trust Dated August 25, 2006 (the Ryans). The crux of Defendants' argument was that the Ryans could not establish the existence of any cause of action without an expert witness. Because the Ryans did not designate an expert witness, Defendants argued…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. New York Times Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Miller v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barnett v. GarriganDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Behazin v. Dignity Health CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Bitner v. Dept. of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- City of Ontario v. We Buy Houses Any ConditionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Colantuono v. Lake CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.