Bissell v. Heath
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oakland. (Moore, J.) Assicmpsit. Defendant brings error. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The Milford State Bank was organized October 21, 1886, and continued in business until the 15th of September, 1891, at which date a bill was filed, under the general banking law of the State (Act No. 205, Laws of 1887), to wind up the affairs of the corporation. Plaintiff was appointed receiver under said act. Claims were filed with, and approved by, him, aggregating $104,-287.81 due depositors, and $4,801.75 due other creditors, besides certain contingent liabilities. Defendant was charged with liability as a stockholder under the provisions of section 46 of the act of 1887, which provides…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Chubb v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- In the Matter of Oliver Lee Co's BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Underwood v. McDuffeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Duke v. ForceWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Foster v. RowMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Davis v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Commerce-Guardian Trust & Savings Bank v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.