Legal Opinion
Agresta v. Goode
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 15, 1992No. Civ. 91-6396PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
This is an action under 42 U.S.C. sections 1983, 1985, and 1986, in which plaintiff alleges that various individuals 1 in the government of the City of Philadelphia conspired to deprive her of her constitutional rights. In particular, she alleges that defendants conspired to enact an unconstitutional bill to deprive her, retroactively, of a remedy in a pending case brought in state court against the city. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons that follow, this…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sameric Corporation Of Delaware, Inc. v. City Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Smith v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- D'ERRICO v. DeFazioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Verde v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- King v. Township of East LampeterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.