Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Saul

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1927No. 1318PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BluME, Chief Justice.

This is an action brought by W. A. Saul and H. C. Saul, as plaintiffs, against W. S. Hinton and Iona B. Hinton, as defendants, to set aside certain conveyances of bank-stock and of cattle and sheep to Iona B. Hinton, wife of W. S. Hinton, and to subject tbat property to tbe payment of a judgment which plaintiffs then bad against W. S. Hinton, and which was based on an indebtedness tbat arose prior to tbe summer of 1921. From a judgment and decree for plaintiffs, tbe defendants have appealed. The parties will herein be referred to as in tbe case below.

1. Tbe cause came…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Seitz v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Keffer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Marysville Development Co. v. HargisIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Lachman v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Bishop v. HawleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jacoby v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Wallis v. NaumanWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Nussbacher v. ManderfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Eblen v. EblenWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Dulaney v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API