Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Hawley

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1925No. 1228PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

M. L. Bishop, plaintiff and appellant, claiming that K. D. Hawley, defendant and respondent, had constructed and maintained a fence across a highway, brought this action for damages sustained by the obstruction of the highway, to abate the fence as a nuisance, and to enjoin the defendant from obstructing the highway in the future. The defendant was the owner of a homestead entered and patented under the public land laws. The fence enclosed the homestead across which the plaintiff claimed the highway had been established by use by the public before the entry of the homestead.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grafton v. . MoirNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Whitesides v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Montgomery v. SomersOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Meservey v. GullifordIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hatch Bros. v. BlackWyoming Supreme Court · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Lindsay Land & Live Stock Co. v. ChurnosUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lovelace v. HightowerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Wilson v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API