Legal Opinion

Sears v. Southworth

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1977No. 14669PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

This is an appeal from a dismissal of the third-party complaint of Appellant South-worth (herein “Southworth”) against Respondent State of Utah, Department of Highways (herein “State”) because of Southworth’s failure to comply with the notice of claim requirement set forth in Section 63-30 — 12, Utah Code Annotated (1953), which is:

A claim against the state or any agency thereof . . . shall be forever barred unless notice thereof is filed with the Attorney General . . . and the agency concerned within one year after the cause of action arises.

Plaintiff below (not a party to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reich v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hunter v. North Mason School Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Turner v. StaggsNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Gallegos Ex Rel. Gallegos v. Midvale CityUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Niblock v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Hall v. Utah State Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Fritz v. Regents of the University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Warren v. Provo City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Yotvat v. RothCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API