Legal Opinion

Niblock v. Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1941No. 6189PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONOUGH, Justice.

Appellant Salt Lake City has appealed from a judgment of the trial court based on a verdict rendered by a jury in favor of respondent in a suit by the latter against the city for damages on account of personal injuries alleged to have been suffered when a truck driven by an employee of the city ran into an automobile owned and operated by responr dent.

The accident occurred near the intersection of Twenty-First South Street and Eleventh East Street in Salt Lake City. A heavily loaded truck driven by an employee of the city bumped into the rear of respondent’s automobile. Fol…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Brown v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Hagerman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Oklahoma City v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Condemarin v. University HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Standiford v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. DeBry v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Driggs v. Utah Teachers Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1943

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API