Legal Opinion

Steichman v. Hurst

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 17, 1971No. 70-258PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

2 Ill. App.3d 415 (1971)

275 N.E.2d 679

DORIS A. STEICHMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ROY HURST et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 70-258.

Illinois Appellate Court — Second District.

November 17, 1971.

Gates W. Clancy and James S. Mills, both of Geneva, for appellants.

Rathje, Woodward, Dyer & Burt, of Wheaton, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

2Opinion of the Court · GuildJustice Guild

This appeal arises from a suit for personal injuries in which a jury verdict was returned for the plaintiff mail carrier and against defendant dog owners, assessing damages at $15,000.

• 1 Plaintiff's complaint consisted of two counts. The first alleged ownership of…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Neering v. I.C.R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Manion v. Brant Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. McEvoy v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  4. Domm v. HollenbeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Reeves v. EcklesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nelson v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Vanderlei v. HeidemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Zears v. DavisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Toney v. BouthillierCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Stehl v. DoseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API