Legal Opinion

Domm v. Hollenbeck

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1913PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. R. M. Skinner, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

In September, 1905, John Domm, the appellee, was bitten by a dog owned by George Hollenbeck, the appellant, in a saloon in Seneca, and brought this suit in the circuit court of LaSalle county to recover damages on account of his injuries. There was a judgment for $750 damages and costs, based on the verdict of a jury, and the Appellate Court for the Second District having affirmed the judgr ment, granted a certificate of importance and an appeal.

The suit was begun to the March term, 1906, and at the March term, 1910, on the day the trial was commenced, the defendant moved the court for leave…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buckley v. LeonardNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Stumps v. KelleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Bishop v. HilliardIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Netusil v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Andrews v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Nelson v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Forsyth v. DuggerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Hicks v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API