Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Eckles

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 29, 1966No. Gen. 66-70PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE MORAN

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff’s amended complaint sought recovery for personal injuries as a result of an attack upon the minor plaintiff by the dog of the defendants. The amended complaint was filed in three counts and alleged the common-law action for recovery as the result of a dog bite. The trial court, in its memorandum of decision, found:

“There is no cause of action for any attack by a dog except under the dog bite statute. It created absolute liability and replaces the common law claims. None of the three counts make out this statutory cause of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beckert v. RisbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Beckert v. RisbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Messa v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bova v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. Callahan v. Edgewater Care & Rehabilitation Center, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Vanderlei v. HeidemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. City of Chicago v. NielsenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. People v. MonosonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API