Legal Opinion

Provident National Bank v. Rooklin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1977No. 391PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment and in denying his petition for reconsideration. Because appellant failed to appeal from the grant of summary judgment, we do not reach the merits of that contention. We affirm the denial of appellant’s petition for reconsideration.

On December 8, 1974, Provident National Bank, appellee, filed a complaint in assumpsit against appellant which sought judgment on three promissory notes totaling $113,-881.64 including principal and interest. After taking depositions and filing…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. City of Pittsburgh v. Alco Parking Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. West Penn Power Company v. GoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Merrick EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. Yorktowne Paper Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Alco Parking Corp. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BraykovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Valley Forge Center Associates v. Rib-It/K.P., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Cheathem v. Temple University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Thorn v. Newman Et Ux.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API