Legal Opinion
Ultratec, Inc. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 28, 2014No. 13-cv-346-bbcPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
In this civil action, plaintiffs Ultratec, Inc. and CapTel, Inc., contend that defendants Sorenson Communications, Inc. and CaptionCall, LLC have infringed the following eight patents related to a telephone relay system between deaf and hearing users: United States Patents Nos. 5,909,-482, 6,233,314, 6,594,346, 6,603,835, 7,319,-*886740 and 7,555,104, all entitled “Relay for Personal Interpreter;” and United States Patents Nos. 7,003,082 and 8,213,578 entitled “System for Text Assisted Telephony.” In addition to challenging plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Immersion Corp. v. HTC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Immersion Corporation v. Htc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016