Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pulaski Oil Co. v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 31, 1923No. 11336PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LYON'S, C.

The plaintiffs in the court below brought suit against the defendant oil company to recover damages alleged to have 'been caused by overflowing and permeating of the soil of the plaintiff’s farm by salt water and other substances produced from an oil well drilled on an adjoining' tract by the defendant company.

Trial was had to a jury, and a verdict in the sum of .$800 was returned against the oil company, plaintiff in error. The oil company appeals-

It appears that the oil company drilled a test well for oil and gas on the Voyles farm adjoining the premises of the.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northup v. EakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Walters v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Niagara Oil Co. v. OgleIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Armstrong v. MaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Town of Norman v. InceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sheridan Oil Co. v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. WorleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Pure Oil Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Owen-Osage Oil & Gas Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Peppers Refining Company v. SpiveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API