Legal Opinion

Town of Norman v. Ince

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 25, 1899PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from the Probate Court of Cleveland County; before J. B. Wilkins, Probate Judge. Action by M. J. Ince against the town of Norman. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Hainer, J.:

This- was an action brought in the probate court of Cleveland county by M. J. Ince, defendant in error, ag-ainst the town of Norman, plaintiff in error, to recover damages arising by reason of the construction and operation of a water standpipe adjacent to plaintiff’s premises. The plaintiff’s petition alleged that she is the •owner of lots 3 and 4, in block 54, in the town of Norman; that on the 5th day of July, 1894, the defendant corporation erected a water standpipe of the beighth of 100 feet .and of the diameter of 12 feet in close proximity to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nevins v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Van Pelt v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. City of Aurora v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. City of Plattsmouth v. BoeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Elliott v. Oil CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. City of Chickasha v. LooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Enid & Anadarko Railway Co. v. WileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  4. Markwardt v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Lund v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API