Legal Opinion

Niagara Oil Co. v. Ogle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1912No. 21,961PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Prom Henry Circuit Court; Ed. Jackson, Judge. •Action by Elijah Ogle against the Niagara Oil Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Bums 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.

Appellee, in February, 1906, commenced this action against appellant for damages for nuisance, and to enjoin the maintenance thereof.

A demurrer to the complaint, for want of facts, was overruled. There was a trial by court, a special finding of facts, and conclusions of law thereon stated. Defendant excepted to each conclusion of law. Judgment for plaintiff for damages, and enjoining defendant from continuing the acts complained of.

Appellant vigorously assails the sufficiency of the complaint. It alleges, among other things, that appellee is the owner of a farm in Delaware county; that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. SandersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Ames v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Barnard v. SherleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Migatz v. StieglitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Templeton v. VoshloeIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Johnston v. City of GalvaIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Sussex Land & Live Stock Co. v. Midwest Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  4. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Riverside Dairy & Stock FarmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  5. United Verde Extension Mining Co. v. RalstonArizona Supreme Court · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API