Legal Opinion

Maulsby v. Minneapolis Casket Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1936No. 10537PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit for infringement of two patents, one, No. 1,724,493, dated August 13, 1929, and a reissue patent No. 18,705," dated January 3, 1933, both of which relate to improvements in fabric-forming machines for use in making decorative designs in casket trimmings. Claim 6 only of the original patent, No. 1,724,493, is charged to have been infringed by defendant’s device. This claim reads as follows:

“6. In a machine of the character described, a shirring bar comprising parallel, spaced apart rods and pattern blocks mounted adjustably on said bars for movement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Smith v. Magic City Kennel Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Penn Electric Switch Co. v. Luthe Hardware Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oliver-Sherwood Co. v. Patterson-Ballagh CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  2. Ruth E. Riley v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc., a Corporation (Formerly Broadway Department Store, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. Nissen Trampoline Company v. American Trampoline Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1961
  4. Riley v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1953
  5. Sunlite Mfg. Co. v. Clarvan Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API