Legal Opinion
Riley v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 16, 1953No. Civ. 12177PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, District Judge.
On pre-trial in this patent case the defendant raised several questions of law. It was agreed between counsel for the plaintiff and defendant that if these questions of law or certain of them were decided in favor of the defendant’s contentions, that that would be the end of the lawsuit. The parties stated and briefed the questions of law. Upon studying the briefs it became apparent that counsel for the parties did not take the same view which the Court had of the agreement concerning the disposition of the questions of law. Accordingly, I addressed a communication to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Shepard v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Roemer v. PeddieSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Ruth E. Riley v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc., a Corporation (Formerly Broadway Department Store, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Application of William O. WesselerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- JOHN BLUE COMPANY v. Dempster Mill Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1958
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.