Hansen v. Larsen

In this appeal, Leif W. Hansen, the appellant, seeks to revive his claim against appellee Richard D. Larsen for breach of a promissory note. Hansen sued 1 Larsen in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County and both parties moved for summary judgment. The court granted Larsen’s motion and entered summary judgment in Larsen’s favor on the ground that the claim was barred by limitations.

ISSUES

Hansen argues, in essence, that:

The trial court erred in ruling that the claim was barred by limitations where:

I. There was a genuine dispute as to whether Larsen was “absent from the State when [the] cause…