Legal Opinion

Gudbrandsen v. Pelto

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1939No. 32,038PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff leave to file a supplemental complaint in garnishment. Plaintiff recovered a judgment, which we affirmed in 199 Minn. 220, 271 N. W. 465, where the facts are fully stated. He then commenced this garnishment proceeding seeking to charge the garnishee as insurer of defendant against liability for the acts resulting in the judgment liability. Defendant was employed by the Zenith Trucking Company driving a truck used for hauling coal for the Carnegie Coal Company. The garnishee issued to the trucking company an insurance policy…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stammer v. KitzmillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Peterson v. MaloneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. In re SnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Smith v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Nelson v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Medd v. FonderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Eicher v. Universal UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Casualty Underwriters, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API