Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Malone

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1931No. Docket No. 107PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendants were charged with the crime of burglary and tried by a jury. This appeal is from the judgment following a verdict of guilty, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

It is admitted that the appellants entered the store of R. J. Wooten in the city of Bakersfield between 11 and 12 o’clock on the night of April 13, 1930, and took therefrom a safe, a number of tires and various other articles of merchandise. The only defense offered at the trial or raised on appeal is that appellants were entrapped into committing the offense by an officer of the law. It appears that for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LanzitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. TomasovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. People v. NorcrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. People v. CaiazzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. LindseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. People v. BranchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. PaysenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. MakovskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API