Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. King

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 21, 1999No. ACM 32594 (recon)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT UPON RECONSIDERATION

SPISAK, Judge:

Our original opinion in this case was unpublished. United States v. King, ACM 32594 (A.F.Ct.CrimApp. June 30, 1998) (un-pub. op.). That opinion is hereby withdrawn. In our original review of this case, we dismissed Charge II and its specification and reassessed the sentence. Appellate government counsel subsequently submitted a timely motion for en banc reconsideration. We granted the government’s motion and also specified the following two issues:

I

DID THE MILITARY JUDGE COMMIT PREJUDICIAL ERROR BY DENYING THE TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL’S…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. ReedUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  4. United States v. NedeauUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. ScheurerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. WaltersUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  4. United States v. ClarkUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  5. United States v. CarterUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API