Legal Opinion
United States v. Walters
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided June 20, 2002No. ACM 34575PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BRESLIN, Senior Judge:
The appellant was charged with the wrongful use of methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (also known as MDMA, or “ecstasy”) on divers occasions between 1 April and 18 July 2000, and distribution of ecstasy during that period, in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. He pled not guilty. The general court-martial, composed of officer and enlisted members, found the appellant guilty of wrongfully using ecstasy, but excepted the words, “on divers occasions,” and substituted the words, “on one occasion.” The court-martial acquitted the appellant of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. ClarkUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. SeiderCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.