Legal Opinion
Summerville v. LOCAL 77
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided February 24, 2005No. 1:03CV770PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER and JUDGMENT
OSTEEN, District Judge.
The court has before it this Standing Order 30 recommendation by the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings or for summary judgment be denied; that Defendants’ motions for summary judgment be granted; and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff timely objected to the recommendation. Defendants responded to the objections.
The record, including the Plaintiffs objections and Defendants’ responses, have been reviewed by this court, and it is the opinion of this court that the recommendation is in accord with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donald R. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DATA GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Fabian v. Freight Drivers & Helpers Local No. 557District Court, D. Maryland · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hamm v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of N.C.North Carolina Business Court · 2010
- Rodriguez v. Service Employees InternationalDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010