Legal Opinion

Hometown Bank v. Acuity Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 20, 2008No. 2007AP1048PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, PJ.

¶ 1. After winning a judgment against Gordon Jungwirth, Hometown Bank filed a nonearnings garnishment action against Acuity Insurance, Jungwirth's liability insurer. The circuit court granted Acuity's motion for summary judgment and awarded it $500 in statutory costs. Hometown appeals only the award of costs, contending that garnishment is an equitable action and Wis. Stat. § 814.02(2) (2005-06) 1 limits fees in equitable actions to $100. We conclude that we need not determine here the nature of a true garnishment action. We affirm the award of costs as a proper exercise of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Bank of Hartland v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  2. Olen v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  3. Reusch v. RoobCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. Gerovac v. Hribar Trucking, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Grant County Service Bureau, Inc. v. TreweekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kirby v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Venerable v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  4. Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API