Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Prince Corporation v. James N. Vandenberg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2016No. 2014AP002295Published

1Opinion of the Court

2016 WI 49

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2014AP2097, 2014AP2295 COMPLETE TITLE: Prince Corporation, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Respondent, v. James N. Vandenberg, Defendant, Van De Hey Real Estate, LLC, Garnishee-Defendant-Cross Claimant-Respondent, Sharon Kempen, Sandra Schmit and Mark Vandenberg, Intervenors-Cross-Claim Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners, v. BMO Harris Bank (f/k/a M&I Marshall & Isley) and State of Wisconsin, Third-Party Defendants, Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL (Reported…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Richards v. Badger Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API