Legal Opinion
Prince Corporation v. James N. Vandenberg
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 2016No. 2014AP002295PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, C.J.
¶ 1 We review a published decision of the court of appeals,2 which affirmed the circuit court's3 order entitling the Department of Revenue (DOR) to garnish land contract proceeds due to James N. Vandenberg (James) and three other tenants-in-common of real property, Sharon Kempen, Sandra Schmidt and Mark Vandenberg (collectively, the intervenors), and denying the intervenors' request to partition the real estate that is subject to the land contract.
¶ 2. Our review centers on three issues: (1) whether the DOR is entitled to garnish any portion of the final land contract payment; and, if so, (2)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Richards v. Badger Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. CabanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Hopper v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Robert R. StafsholtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Allen Gahl v. Aurora Health Care, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Badgerland Overhead Door, LLC v. Today's Overhead Door, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
- Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Adam M. BlackmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.