State Bank of Hartland v. Arndt
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.
Gerald and Evelyn Arndt appeal from a judgment in favor of The State Bank of Hartland foreclosing Arndts' interests in their homestead. Arndts contend that the bank is barred from foreclosing its real estate security interest because (1) the bank breached various duties to them by permitting a financing statement covering their business assets to lapse, (2) foreclosure against Evelyn's interest is precluded by her failure to sign a secured note, and (3) the security agreement did not cover future advances. Arndts also contend that the court allowed unreasonable attorney fees. We reject these…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wassenaar v. PanosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Standard Theatres, Inc. v. State, Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Blue Rock Shopping Center, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. Appeal of Max Ambach and Rose AmbachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Cogswell v. Robertshaw Controls Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Walker v. BignellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- United States National Bank v. BogeOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Hemenway v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Fiumefreddo v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.