Legal Opinion
Smith v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 27, 2013No. Case No. 3:12-cv-281PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 60)
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This civil action is before the Court on Defendants’1 joint motion to dismiss (Doc. *85660), and the parties’ responsive memoranda (Docs. 64, 65).
I. FACTS AS ALLEGED BY THE PLAINTIFF
For purposes of this motion to dismiss; the Court must: (1) view the third amended complaint (“TAC”) in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff; and (2) take all well-pleaded factual allegations as true. Tackett v. M & G Polymers, 561 F.3d 478, 488 (6th Cir.2009).
On November 30, 2012, the Board of Directors of Robbins & Meyers,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Michael Kuebler v. Vectren CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Trahan v. Interactive Intelligence Grp., Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2018
- Ridler v. Hutchinson Technology Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Zalvin v. AyersOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Montanio v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.