Stoke v. Converse
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Emmet District Court. — Hon. D. F. Coyle, J udge. Action for damages because of alleged misrepresentation and guaranty of invoice value of goods resulted in a verdict for defendants, and from judgment thereon the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The plaintiff owned three hundred and twenty acres of land in Redwood county, Minn., subject to a mortgage of $6,000 on which there was interest accrued amounting to $300. One Hodge had acquired by trade a stock of goods, caused it to be moved to Estherville, and a bill of sale thereof deposited with the defendant, *275Converse, as security of an indebtedness of Iiodge to the bank of which Converse was cashier. An exchange of this stock of goods was made for the land subject to the incumbrance, and plaintiff says that he was induced so to do by the representation of Converse that there were from…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Sigafus v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Krumm v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Clark v. . BairdNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Stuck v. Delta Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Smith v. Middle States Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Shuttlefield v. NeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.