Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 24, 2007No. 05-1521PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STREIT, Justice.

What does a suspect in custody need to do to invoke his right to an attorney? He just needs to ask for one. In the present case, the suspect repeatedly requested to speak with an attorney. Instead of ending the interrogation, the detective responded “You don’t trust us enough to do it without a lawyer?” We find Kevin Harris’s Fifth Amendment right to the presence of an attorney was violated when the detective continued to interrogate him after he invoked this right. Moreover, the detective violated Harris’s statutory right to contact a family member by refusing to allow Harris…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. LymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. State v. EfflerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  3. State Of Iowa Vs. Colby Alan PalmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  4. State v. WallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  5. State of Iowa v. Justin Alexander MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API