Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Potter

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1940No. 4559PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MABRY, Justice.

Appellee Stewart recovered from appellant Potter a judgment in the sum of $200 actual and $100 exemplary damages upon suit for alleged false and fraudulent representations made in the sale to appellee of an automobile, and Potter, defendant below, appeals.

Appellee claimed he was given a used and repossessed car when he thought and was advised by the agent of appellant that he was purchasing a new one. The trial court fixed actual damages at $200 upon the theory that such was the difference in value between a new car and one which had been driven from 1500 to 1700 miles and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Cleghorn v. . N.Y. Cen. H. River R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Gill v. SellingOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Colbert v. Journal Publishing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Romero v. Mervyn'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bank of New Mexico v. RiceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Sauter v. St. Michael's CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Campbell v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API