Legal Opinion

Raney v. Tompkins

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 1, 1970No. [No. 70, October Term, 1950.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

The question raised in this appeal is whether a restrictive covenant in a deed, against the use of land retained by the grantors for purposes of a gasoline filling station, is enforceable by the grantees against assignees of the grantors. Summarizing the material facts, it appears that on March 20, 1942 George C. Shoemaker and wife, the owners of a triangular parcel of land in Montgomery County, known as Triangule Park, conveyed one corner of the tract, designated as parcel A, to the appellees for use as a filling station. There were some 67 lots laid out upon the portion of the tract…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Buffalo Academy of Sacred Heart v. Boehm Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Halle v. NewboldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  3. Newbold v. Peabody Heights Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  4. Lowes v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  5. Scholtes v. McColganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davidson Bros. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. Martin v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Chevy Chase Village v. JaggersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Rogers v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. FrankelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API