Legal Opinion

Martin v. Weinberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 19, 2001No. [No. 19, October Term, 1954.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This appeal is from a decree permanently enjoining the appellants from using lots 27 and 28, Block 0, Murray Hill, in the City of Annapolis, for a parking lot. The question turns on the validity and enforceability of certain restrictions in the deeds.

In 1890, the owners of nine of the ten tracts into which a larger tract had been divided by the heirs of James Murray, subdivided these tracts into lots according to a plat known as “Melvin’s plan of Murray -Hill”, which was placed on record in 1896. In 1914, four exchange deeds, which further partitioned certain of the lots among some of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Himmel v. HendlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  2. Schlicht v. WengertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  3. Levy v. Dundalk Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  4. Bachman v. Colpaert Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Clem v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Bowie v. MIE, Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Turner v. BrocatoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Miller v. BAY CITY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Belleview Construction Co. v. Rugby Hall Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Maryland Trust Co. v. Tulip Realty Co. of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API