Legal Opinion

Halle v. Newbold

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 13, 1888PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. This appeal is taken from a pro forma decree in favor of the vendor of real estate, on a special case stated between him and the vendee for the opinion of the Court, as to the character of the title offered in fulfilment of an agreement to sell said real estate, and to give a clear title to the vendee.- The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In 1855 the heirs of Caroline Donaldson owned in fee a tract of land lying on Fulton street, in Baltimore City. Thomas Donaldson, who was one of the heirs of Caroline Donaldson, toot in 1855 a deedfronithe other heirs, for a lot on Fulton street to'himself in severalty.

In the deed from the other heirs’of Caroline Donaldson to Thomas Donaldson there is this covenant:

“And the said parties of the first part (the grantors) hereto, for themselves, their heirs, executors, adminis-. *268trators and assigns do hereby covenant with the said Thomas Donaldson, his heirs and assigns, that no improvement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Clark v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  3. Thruston v. MinkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. McKenrick v. Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. Summers v. BeelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  3. Newbold v. Peabody Heights Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  4. Boyden v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Dixon v. Van Sweringen Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API